STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR BUSINESS INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT IN POST-WAR UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/sis.3.(01).6Keywords:
innovation, investment, business developmen, post-war recovery, Ukraine, strategic priorities, economic resilienceAbstract
This article delves into the strategic imperatives shaping business innovation and investment development in Ukraine during its post-war recovery phase. Recognizing the immense economic disruptions caused by conflict, it identifies key hurdles impeding private sector revitalization, including large-scale in- frastructure devastation, financial instability, capital flight, and a weakened capacity for technological advancement. The study leverages both global best practices and Ukraine’s unique socio-economic landscape to formulate a comprehensive framework for determining innovation-investment priorities across various sectors, regions, and enterprise scales.
Special emphasis is placed on the role of public-private partnerships (PPPs), adaptive financing mechanisms, and institutional restructuring in fostering a resilient and competitive business environment. The research underscores how targeted investments in digital transformation, green technology, and industrial modernization can serve as catalysts for sustainable economic revival. Additionally, it explores the significance of policy coherence, government incentives, and international collaboration in reinforcing Ukraine’s long-term economic reintegration and market positioning.
To bridge the gap between policy ambition and business execution, the paper presents a phased implementation roadmap, ensuring alignment between national recovery strategies and corporate innovation trajectories. By outlining actionable steps and sector-specific investment pathways, it offers strategic guidance to policymakers, investors, and business leaders seeking to navigate post-war economic reconstruction with agility and foresight.
References
Bilorus, O. (2016). Regularities and trends of reproductive evolution and structural transformation of global capital. Economic theory, 1, 9–15.
Brahmbhatt, Milan & Canuto, Otaviano & Vostroknutova, Ekaterina. (2010). Dealing with Dutch Disease. World Bank — Economic Premise. 1–7.
Collier, P. (2009). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford University Press.
Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.
Heiets, V. (2016). M. Economy of Ukraine: key problems and prospects. Economics and forecasting, 1, 15–18.
Heiets, V. (2016). Peculiarities of the relationship between economic and political prerequisites for the reconstruc- tive development of the economy of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 12, 5–14.
Kaleniuk, D., Melnyk, A., & Rizak, V. (2022). EU Support Mechanisms for Ukraine’s Innovation Recovery. Kyiv: Institute for Economic Research.
Mazur, O., & Lukach, N. (2023). Digital Resilience of Ukrainian Business during War: Innovation as a Response. Economics and Forecasting, (2), 14–26.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2021). Strategy for Innovation Development 2021–2030.
National Recovery Plan of Ukraine (2023). Business and Innovation Pillar.
OECD (2021). Investment Policy for Fragile Contexts.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
UNDP (2018). Resilience and Recovery in Post-Conflict Settings: Innovation as a Catalyst. [15] World Bank (2014). Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Андрій Золковер, Ростислав Яцентюк, Джон О. Айедогбон

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.