SCENARIO FORECASTING OF ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60022/sis.1.(01).6

Keywords:

scenario forecasting, entrepreneurship, sold product, remuneration of labour, current and noncurrent assets, market, crisis

Abstract

Today’s institutional environment for large, medium-sized and small enterprises is dynamic and difficult to predict. The global crisis caused by fundamental changes in the business environment and financial markets has caused a structural breakdown in the logic of doing business, putting on the agenda the problem of choosing the most efficient way for companies to develop with the least expenditure of resources. Scenario forecasting can help managers to make the right decisions and thus reduce the negative impact of the external environment on the business. The information basis for our study was the results of the development of large, medium, small and micro- enterprises in Ukraine for the years 2011–2021. In order to implement scenario prediction, we used methods of mathematical modelling and forecasting, based on the study of the performance of economic systems over a certain retrospective period. Using the Farrar- Glober algorithm, we tested the multicollinearity or interdependence between the indicators. The forecasting of the development of enterprises under conditions of uncertainty is proposed to be carried out according to three scenarios. Consequently, the implementation of the modelling logic has shown that for both entrepreneurship as a whole and for its individual types, the first scenario with a 10% increase in labour costs, while the amount of noncurrent assets remains unchanged, has the greatest effect. The highest rate of growth in the volume of output sold is provided by all scenarios considered for medium- sized enterprises, slightly less for large enterprises and the lowest for small and micro-enterprises. The proposed scenario forecasting of enterprise development under uncertainty is easy enough to use and does not require a significant amount of labour or financial resources, which is especially important in the context of any business entity’s desire to conserve resources. The value of our proposed modelling is in the fact that using the obtained equations of multiple linear regression, it is possible to estimate other possible scenarios of enterprise development and select the best one among them.

References

Engel, Y., Kaandorp, M., & Elfring, T. (2017). Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of business venturing, 32(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001

Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001

Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). From toys to tools: The co-evolution of technological and entrepreneurial developments in the drone industry. Business Horizons, 60(6), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.08.001

Dodd, S. D. (2002). Metaphors and meaning: A grounded cultural model of US entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883–9026(01)00072–6

Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of business venturing, 25(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001

McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A. Y., & Tsai, W. (1992). Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of business venturing, 7(6), 441–458.

Snihur, Y., Lamine, W., & Wright, M. (2021). Educating engineers to develop new business models: Exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities in technology- based firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.011

Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817

O’Brien, F. A., & Meadows, M. (2013). Scenario orientation and use to support strategy development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.006

De Brentani, U. (1995). New industrial service development: Scenarios for success and failure. Journal of Business Research, 32(2), 93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148–2963(93)00040–8

Solodovnik, O., Zhemoyda, O., Soroka, A., Matsola, S., Tytarchuk, I., & Bielialov, T. (2021). Innovative development of the foreign economic activity of the enterprise. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4468

Flores, P., Segura, E., Jaramillo, R., Ulcuango, L., & Suбrez, L. (2023). Micro-enterprise Management To-wards Scenario Building for Decision Making. Trends in Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering: Proceed-ings of ICAETT 2022, 575–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25942-5_45

Škare, M., Soriano, D. R., & Porada- Rochoń, M. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120469

Picanço-Castro, V., Pereira, C. G., Covas, D. T., Porto, G. S., Athanassiadou, A., & Figueiredo, M. L. (2020). Emerging patent landscape for nonviral vectors used for gene therapy. Nature biotechnology, 38(2), 151–157.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0402-x

Cloete, N., van Schalkwyk, F., Winnink, J., & Tijssen, R. (2022). Researching research universities in Af-rica. In A Research Agenda for Global Higher Education (pp. 131–152). Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781800376069.00013

Voinea, G. D., Gоrbacia, F., Duguleană, M., Boboc, R. G., & Gheorghe, C. (2023). Mapping the Emergent Trends in Industrial Augmented Reality. Electronics, 12(7), 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071719

Kushnirenko, O., Gakhovich, N., & Venger, L. (2023). Strategic scenarios for sustainable industrial development of Ukraine in the post-war period. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-1-89-99

Bochulia, T., & Sivitska, S. (2022). Strategies of the New Time in the Perspective Development of Innovation-Oriented Economy of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Building Innovations: ICBI 2020 3 (pp. 591–605). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85043-2_56

Bui, T., & Zenchenko, A. (2022). Financial stability and independence of municipalities in Ukraine. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Економічні науки, 7(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2022.7.1.10–19

Varnalii, Z., Kulyk, P., Nikytenko, D., Cheberyako, O., & Hurochkina, V. (2023). Circular economy implementation as a strengthening factor in the economic security of Ukraine during the post-war period. In IOP Conference Se-ries: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1126, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012006

Zahra, S. A. (2022). Institutional change and international entrepreneurship after the war in Ukraine. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1689–1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12655

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Zubro, T., & Serhiienko, S. (2023). SCENARIO FORECASTING OF ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY. Smart Economy, Entrepreneurship and Security, 1(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.60022/sis.1.(01).6