THE ESG (ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE) CONCEPT IN MODERN ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND ITS ROLE IN SHAPING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/sis.4.(01).4Keywords:
ESG, sustainable development, environmental responsibility, social inclusion, corporate governance, socio- economic stability, energy securityAbstract
The assessment of the role of the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) concept is an important task for ensuring sustainable socio- economic development and strengthening the resilience of modern economic systems. At the same time, within contemporary economic science, there remains a lack of unified methodological approaches that allow for a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the impact of ESG factors on sustainable development outcomes. In this context, it is particularly relevant to consider the interaction of environmental, social, and governance components, as well as the system of external and internal factors that either stimulate or constrain sustainable transformation processes. An important scientific challenge is the improvement of analytical tools, methods, and stages for assessing ESG implementation, taking into account current global economic, environmental, and institutional changes.
The study employs a set of theoretical and empirical methods that enable the achievement of the research objectives, including bibliometric analysis, statistical analysis, abstraction, synthesis, induction, and deduction. Bibliometric mapping using the VOSviewer tool is applied to identify key research trends and conceptual linkages in the scientific discourse on ESG and sustainable development. The empirical basis of the study relies on official statistical data from Eurostat, which reflect environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development, including greenhouse gas emissions, labour market indicators, and social inclusion metrics. The results of the study confirm that ESG principles play a significant role in enhancing the sustainability of economic systems, improving corporate resilience, and supporting long-term socio- economic stability. The integration of ESG factors contributes to environmental responsibility, social inclusion, and governance quality, which together form the foundation for sustainable development. Consequently, ESG performance requires systematic monitoring and quantitative assessment at both corporate and macroeconomic levels. The findings indicate an increasing need to develop and implement a new generation of public and corporate policies based on ESG principles, aimed at ensuring balanced economic growth, environmental protection, and social well-being. The proposed analytical approach may be useful for policymakers, investors, and corporate stakeholders, as it enables timely assessment of ESG impacts and supports the formulation of effective strategies for sustainable development in the future.
References
Zhang, H. (2023). A literature review on the impact of ESG information disclosure quality on corporate value. Business Watch, 9(32), 26–28, 36.
Qiu, D. (2023). Research on the impact of corporate ESG performance on institutional investors’ holding preferences. Modern Business, (22), 133–136.
Pan, Z. H., Sun, Y., Feng, W. F., et al. (2024). Straddling mandatory standardisation and voluntary ESG practices: A sustainable innovation path for vehicle intelligence. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 7(1), 44–53.
Liu, J. T., Zhang, Y., & Tan, L. (2023). Responsible internationalization: ESG advantages and overseas operations of Chinese enterprises. World Economic Research, (11), 60–77, 136.
Ge, C. R., & Han, J. (2023). Study on the impact of green bond issuance on corporate ESG performance. East China Economic Management, 37(12), 102–113.
Pan, Z. H., & Zhang, Z. S. (2023). Risk factor analysis and solution preference thinking of GWM’s IoT eco-project management. Automotive and Driving Maintenance, (4), 9–13.
Huang, X. H., Yao, X., & Liu, F. C. (2023). Corporate ESG ratings and green innovation under the dual carbon goals: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Changchun Finance College, (6), 55–65.
He, L. L. (2023). Research on the impact of ESG performance on institutional investors’ investment decisions. Chinese Agricultural Accounting, 33(22), 133–136.
Pan, Z. H., Ding, G. Q., Xu, B. Y., et al. (2023). Financial analysis and reflection on GWM. National Circulation Economy, (12), 172–176.
Zheng, Z. Y., & Xu, Y. B. (2023). Central environmental inspection, second- generation involvement, and family business ESG responsibility ratings. Economics and Management, 37(6), 30–39.
Skorik, M., & Muzhaylo, R. (2025). Model of sustainable development in agribusiness: Synergy of circularity, ESG standards, and social partnership. Ukrainian Economic Journal, (9), 136–142.
Internauka. (2025). Integration of ESG indicators into corporate reporting and financial management standards. International Scientific Journal “Internauka”. Series: Economic Sciences.
Inclusive Economics Journal. (2025). Survey of Ukrainian firms on ESG awareness and reporting needs. Inclusive Economics, 2(08).
Eurostat. (2025). Sustainable development in the European Union — Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context (2025 edition). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
Eurostat. (2025). Sustainable development in the European Union (summary brochure). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Микола Яремчук

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.